Ionic Radius

This relates to AR but instead of a neutral atom, we have an ion.

Trend:

  • If you gain electrons → ANION → IR ↑ with respect to neutral atom
  • If you lose electrons → CATION → IR ↓ with respect to neutral atom

Ex. Ca → Ca2+ + 2 e—  

Ca has a larger IR than Ca2+

IR1


Ex. Cl + 1 e  → Cl

Clhas a larger IR than Cl

IR2


Why?

Anions gain electrons, thereby decreasing their effective nuclear charge, Zeff, and extending their ionic radii. This occurs when the # electrons outnumbers the # protons and nucleus’s attractive force is not strong enough to hold all the electrons in.

So as electron # ↑  Zeff  ↓  IR ↑

Cations lose electrons, thereby increasing the proton:electron ratio, thereby increasing their effective nuclear charge, Zeff, and decreasing their ionic radii.

If they enough electrons to clear out their valence shell altogether, then they can close the shell, decreasing their “n” value and also decreasing their ionic radii even further.

So as electron # ↓  Zeff  n # ↓  IR ↓

Ex. Ca vs. Ca2+

Ca: [Ar] 4s2   n= 4    ↑ IR                      Ca2+: [Ne] 3s2 3p6     n= 3    ↓ IR

IR3The Zeff or attractive force of the positive nucleus on electrons is directly related to the # protons. More protons, more + charge, more pull. The greater the Zeff, then the greater the pull on the surrounding negative electrons and more compressed the atom and its radius becomes. It’s like a tug of war between the nucleus and the electrons. 

IR4

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s